[Cite - Content engine](/cite) | [AI visibility analytics](/platform/visibility-analytics) | [Agent-optimized pages](/platform/ai-optimized-pages)
[Pricing](/pricing) | [Login](https://app.mersel.ai) | [Book a Call](#) | [Book an Audit Call](#) | [Book a Free Call](#)
[Home](/) | [Blog](/blog) | Language

**AI Agent Status**
- **AI Visits Today:** 3
- **Optimized Agents:** GPTBotOptimized, ClaudeBotOptimized, PerplexityBotOptimized
- **Browser Environment:** Chrome 122Original

**How to Appear in Google AI Overviews: Optimization Guide**
- **Reading Time:** 18 min read
- **Author:** Mersel AI Team
- **Date:** March 13, 2026

On this page

Appearing in Google AI Overviews requires two things working simultaneously: content formatted for LLM extraction and a technical infrastructure that AI crawlers can actually read. Traditional SEO rankings are not a reliable path in. Only 17% of pages cited in Google AI Overviews currently rank in the organic top 10, according to BrightEdge data from 2025 and 2026.

B2B commercial queries are no longer safe ground for traditional search strategies. BrightEdge tracking shows that B2B technology queries trigger AI Overviews at an 82% rate, up from 36%. If you are a Head of SEO at a SaaS company, your evaluation-stage traffic is being intercepted before buyers click anything.

This guide covers the specific requirements for earning generative search citations:
- Exact formatting parameters Google's generative search uses to select citations.
- The step-by-step implementation sequence required for earning citations.
- Common obstacles where most teams get stuck trying to execute this alone.

# Key Takeaways: AI Overview Performance at a Glance

| Metric | Data Detail | Source/Context |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **B2B Tech Trigger Rate** | 82% of queries (increased from 36%) | BrightEdge 2025-2026 |
| **Conversion Premium** | 14.2% AI-referred traffic (5x vs 2.8% Organic) | Mersel AI Analysis |
| **Citation Source** | 17% of citations rank in organic Top 10 | BrightEdge 2025-2026 |
| **llms.txt Efficiency** | -30% token costs / +7% citation accuracy | 10% Domain Adoption |
| **Commercial Intent** | 18.57% appearance rate (up from 8.15%) | Semrush 2025-2026 |
| **Transactional Intent** | 13.94% appearance rate (up from 1.98%) | Semrush 2025-2026 |
| **Execution Gap** | Engineering and content bandwidth | Primary Bottleneck |

## Why AI Overviews Are Eating Commercial Traffic

**AI Overviews are capturing commercial traffic because enterprise buyers adopt AI-powered search at three times the rate of average consumers and use these tools to build vendor lists before contacting sales.** This adoption rate is not a projection; it is reshaping how B2B shortlists form. Bain and Company research found that 85% of B2B buyers already have a Day One List before they speak to a sales rep.

B2B buyers construct vendor lists in AI conversations rather than traditional Google searches. When a buyer asks ChatGPT or Perplexity for the "best compliance tool for a Series A fintech," the AI surfaces recommendations that bypass traditional organic results. This dynamic is shifting the point of influence earlier in the buyer's journey.

Google is accelerating this dynamic by shifting generative answers into mid-funnel and bottom-funnel territory. Semrush data shows that AI Overviews appearing on purely informational queries dropped from 91.3% in early 2025 to 57.1% by early 2026. Meanwhile, commercial-intent appearances surged from 8.15% to 18.57% and transactional-intent appearances jumped from 1.98% to 13.94% in the same period.

**Organic click-through rates for traditional blue links drop by 61% when a Google AI Overview appears for a query.** According to industry tracking data, brands that earn a citation within the AI Overview itself see a 35% increase in organic clicks. The same dynamic that punishes brands for being absent rewards them for being cited.

Shopping and basic e-commerce queries remain largely protected because Google prioritizes its Shopping Ads revenue. Only 3.2% of e-commerce queries trigger an AI Overview. In contrast, sectors like B2B SaaS, education, and healthcare have no such protection and face higher exposure to generative search results.

| Market Segment | AI Overview Trigger Rate | Protection Status |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Shopping & E-commerce | 3.2% | Protected (Shopping Ads Revenue) |
| B2B SaaS | Not Protected | No Protection |
| Education | Not Protected | No Protection |
| Healthcare | Not Protected | No Protection |

# The Formatting Guide for Google's Generative Search Parameters

**Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems prioritize semantic density, entity relationships, and factual substantiation over traditional metrics like keyword density or backlink profiles.** These systems synthesize a single authoritative answer, allowing a well-structured page at position 47 to earn an AI Overview citation while a thin page at position 2 is overlooked.

Princeton researchers (Aggarwal et al., 2023, arXiv:2311.09735) documented that specific content adjustments improve generative engine visibility by up to 40%. Their black-box optimization framework identified five high-impact adjustments that significantly boost citation probability for B2B commercial content:

*   **Statistical substantiation:** Concrete data points, metrics, and quantitative evidence boost citation probability. AI models favor empirical claims over qualitative assertions because they are verifiable and extractable.
*   **Authoritative quotations:** Direct quotes from named subject matter experts signal high informational value to RAG retrieval algorithms. A claim attributed to a named researcher at a known institution carries more retrieval weight than an unattributed assertion.
*   **Citation mechanisms:** Outbound links to credible primary sources enhance the E-E-A-T signal of the host document. The AI evaluates document trustworthiness based on the quality of external citations.
*   **Semantic structure:** BrightEdge data shows that unordered lists appear in 61% of AI Overview responses. H2 and H3 heading hierarchies that mirror the logical structure of a buyer's question provide clean extraction targets for RAG systems.
*   **Authoritative tone:** Marketing language such as "revolutionary" or "best-in-class" reduces citation probability. LLMs are trained to synthesize objective answers, and copy that reads like a brochure is deprioritized.

Statistical substantiation and entity clarity provide the highest marginal impact for B2B commercial content. These signals are frequently absent from pages relying solely on traditional SEO. RAG retrieval systems weigh six input signals when selecting AI Overview citations, and no single factor dominates the selection process.

## Step 1: Map the Prompts Buyers Actually Use

**Identifying the exact conversational queries buyers type into AI tools during evaluation is the essential first step before writing content.** This process differs from traditional keyword research because search volume data is often zero for highly specific LLM prompts. For example, a buyer may ask, "Which payroll platform supports contractor payments in Southeast Asia for a 25-person startup?"

Utilize these primary sources for prompt mapping:
*   Sales call transcripts
*   Customer interviews
*   AI referral data in GA4
*   Competitor citation patterns (identifying which prompts consistently surface rivals)

This prompt inventory functions as the master brief for every content decision that follows. By mapping these specific queries, organizations ensure their content directly addresses the precise conversational inputs used by buyers during the evaluation phase.

## Step 2: Structure Content for LLM Extraction

Format every piece of content to match RAG system extraction patterns once the prompt map is complete. Practitioners utilize the "Markdown Mirror" approach to write for human readers while simultaneously structuring for machine extraction. AI Overviews pull the most succinct, factually complete answers available, making information density a critical selection signal. The formatting rules are specific:

- [ ] **Open with a direct, citable answer in the first 100 words.** AI Overviews pull the most succinct, factually complete answer available. Burying the answer in paragraph three loses the citation.
- [ ] **Use hierarchical H2 and H3 tags that mirror the logical structure of the buyer's question.** The heading should be able to stand alone as a search query.
- [ ] **Include at least one data table or unordered list per major section.** BrightEdge confirms that lists appear in 61% of AI Overview responses.
- [ ] **Strip introductory filler.** Information density is a selection signal. Two paragraphs of scene-setting before the answer reduce citation probability.

For a deeper look at how AI systems parse and prioritize page elements, see our guide on [best practices for AI overview optimization](/blog/best-practices-for-ai-overview-optimization).

## Step 3: Deploy Schema Markup for Entity Clarity

Schema markup ensures that the entity relationships AI systems need to cite you accurately are mathematically defined rather than inferred. Once content is formatted correctly, you must tell AI crawlers explicitly what your brand is by deploying JSON-LD in the page head. This technical layer eliminates ambiguity, preventing LLMs from guessing what your product does or who it serves.

| Schema Type | Required Data Points |
| :--- | :--- |
| **Organization** | Company name, description, founding date, products, and service area. |
| **Product** | Explicit feature descriptions, use cases, integrations, and pricing tier context. |
| **FAQPage** | Every FAQ block on the site must be machine-readable. |
| **HowTo** | Process-oriented content where each step must be explicitly marked. |

```json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Mersel AI",
  "description": "A 7-step framework for appearing in Google AI Overviews through technical SEO and GEO.",
  "url": "https://mersel.ai"
}
```

LLMs frequently omit brands and cite competitors when entity definitions are unclear or ambiguous. If the LLM has to guess what your product does or who it serves, it will prioritize sources with cleaner entity definitions. Deploying these schema types ensures your brand's role and offerings are explicitly defined for accurate extraction by AI crawlers.

## Step 4: Deploy `llms.txt` as an AI Sitemap

Deploy an `llms.txt` file in your root directory to serve as a curated inclusion guide for AI crawlers. This protocol is distinct from `robots.txt` because it functions as a roadmap for what AI systems should prioritize rather than an exclusion list. It ensures that generative engines find the most relevant data for their training sets and real-time answers.

| Feature | `robots.txt` | `llms.txt` |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Primary Purpose** | Exclusion list (what to block) | Inclusion guide (what to read) |
| **AI Interaction** | Dictates access restrictions | Provides attribution and context |
| **Function** | Prevents crawler access | Guides AI systems on what to read |

Search Engine Land documents that `llms.txt` tells AI systems exactly what to read and how to attribute it. This distinction is critical for Generative Engine Optimization. By providing a clear path for attribution, brands maintain control over how their information is presented in AI-generated summaries and ensure proper credit for their content.

A properly structured `llms.txt` file contains these essential components:
*   A brief brand description
*   Canonical entry points
*   Explicit links to flagship content with one-sentence summaries
*   Specific attribution guidelines for AI models

> **Efficiency Benefit**: Directing crawlers to clean markdown versions of content pages (e.g., `domain.com/pricing.md` instead of full HTML) reduces LLM token processing costs by nearly 30% and improves model accuracy by over 7%, according to Yotpo's analysis.

Approximately 10% of domains have currently deployed `llms.txt`, meaning early adoption provides a meaningful competitive advantage. By implementing this AI sitemap, brands ensure their data is processed with higher accuracy and lower computational overhead than the 90% of competitors who have not yet adopted the standard.

## Step 5: Eliminate AI Crawler Blockers

Auditing for blockers prevents AI crawlers from partially ingesting or abandoning your pages once positive infrastructure is deployed. These technical barriers interfere with how LLMs parse and understand your site's core content. Identifying and removing these obstacles is essential to ensure that AI systems can fully extract and process your information.

The three most common issues include:

| AI Crawler Blocker | Technical Impact | Resulting Visibility Issue |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| JavaScript Dependency | GPTBot, PerplexityBot, and ClaudeBot frequently fail to render client-side JavaScript. | Product descriptions and pricing information remain invisible to AI if they require JS execution. |
| Heavy Visual/Marketing Architecture | Pop-ups, complex CSS, and image-heavy layouts increase computational token costs for LLMs. | High token costs cause AI crawlers to partially ingest the page rather than the full content. |
| Inconsistent Internal Linking | AI systems map relationships between entities by following internal links; orphaned pages and shallow structures disrupt this process. | AI systems produce an incomplete knowledge graph of your brand, which is treated as low-confidence information. |

## Step 6: Build the Feedback Loop

Connect Google Search Console, GA4, and all available AI referral data immediately after publishing content and deploying infrastructure. This integration allows teams to track specific prompts driving citations and identify which posts successfully convert AI-referred visitors. Tracking these metrics ensures that the generative search strategy remains data-driven rather than speculative.

Most DIY programs stall during the feedback phase because they treat monitoring as a passive activity. An effective feedback loop requires returning to existing posts to update them based on the specific signals the algorithm rewards for your category. This iterative process moves beyond generic GEO best practices to optimize for vertical-specific citation patterns.

Early content assets accumulate signal over time through consistent refinement. A post published in month one should be materially better by month four as the feedback loop identifies successful citation patterns. Detailed instructions for setting up the necessary measurement infrastructure are available in our guide on [how to track Gemini AI search visibility](/blog/how-to-track-gemini-ai-search-visibility).

## Step 7: Target Bottom-of-Funnel Content First

Commercial queries most at risk from AI Overview interception provide the highest-quality traffic and engagement. AI-referred visitors demonstrate significantly higher intent and engagement metrics than traditional search users. The conversion rate for AI-referred traffic is 14.2%, representing a 5x premium over the 2.8% conversion rate seen in traditional organic search.

| Metric | AI-Referred Traffic | Traditional Google Referrals |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Average Engagement Time | 8 to 10 minutes | 2 to 3 minutes |
| Conversion Rate | 14.2% | 2.8% |

Prioritize specific content formats that generate measurable pipeline impact in the shortest time:
*   **Comparison posts:** e.g., "X vs. Y for mid-market SaaS"
*   **Alternative roundups:** e.g., "Best alternatives to [incumbent]"
*   **Use-case breakdowns:** e.g., "How [category] works for [specific vertical]"
*   **Category definitions:** Content that mirrors the exact prompts buyers use during vendor evaluation.

The implementation sequence is critical for attribution and performance. Prompt mapping must precede content production because writing without knowing the buyer's exact AI query produces content that earns Google rankings but fails to secure AI citations. Infrastructure like Schema and `llms.txt` must be active before the feedback loop begins to ensure citation data is attributable to specific pages.

# When DIY Implementation Fails

Most SEO teams encounter three specific obstacles when attempting to implement a Generative Engine Optimization framework internally. These "walls" often prevent the transition from theoretical strategy to measurable citation growth.

**Wall one: Content bandwidth.** Building citation density across dozens of commercial prompts requires a dedicated production capacity that exceeds standard editorial limits. A single content manager cannot typically absorb the 12 to 20 prompt-matched articles required per month while maintaining existing SEO output.

**Wall two: Engineering backlog.** Technical requirements such as Schema deployment, `llms.txt` configuration, JavaScript rendering fixes, and internal linking audits require significant engineering time. At most mid-market companies, these GEO infrastructure needs rarely bypass the standard six-month engineering sprint backlog.

**Wall three: Feedback loop integration.** Connecting Google Search Console (GSC), GA4, and AI referral attribution into a closed loop is not a standard analytics configuration. This process requires specialized technical implementation and an understanding of GEO citation mechanics to interpret the resulting data accurately.

These obstacles lead to the "dashboard trap," where teams invest in AI Share of Voice monitoring tools like Profound, AthenaHQ, or Evertune. While these tools provide clear reports on missing prompts, teams often lack the capacity to act on the data. Our guide on [generative engine optimization software](/blog/generative-engine-optimization-software) details how this monitoring-vs-execution divide impacts market performance.

# The Managed Path: How a Full-Stack GEO Program Handles This

Successful GEO requires the simultaneous execution of the content layer, the infrastructure layer, and a live feedback loop. These three elements are rarely available as off-the-shelf components for lean marketing teams. Simultaneous execution ensures that content is immediately supported by the technical data structures generative engines require for extraction.

Mersel AI closes this execution gap by operating at both layers simultaneously. The program provides a citation-first content engine built from actual buyer prompts, delivered directly to your CMS on a continuous cadence. This is paired with an AI-native infrastructure layer deployed behind your existing site to ensure maximum visibility.

This dual-layer approach ensures that GPTBot and PerplexityBot receive a clean, structured, and citation-ready version of your brand. Human visitors experience no change to the site interface, and the entire system is deployed without requiring internal engineering resources or development work.

The feedback loop integrates Google Search Console, GA4, and AI referral data to track which posts earn citations and which prompts drive conversions. This system continuously updates existing content based on real performance signals rather than theoretical assumptions about GEO best practices. It ensures that content strategy evolves based on actual category data and real-world performance.

Mersel AI operates as a managed service rather than a self-serve dashboard, prioritizing execution for teams that require active implementation. While other platforms provide standalone monitoring tools, the managed model offers a practical path for ensuring optimization tasks are completed.
* **Mersel AI**: A done-for-you managed service focused on execution and implementation.
* **Profound and AthenaHQ**: Self-serve platforms suitable for teams needing standalone real-time prompt monitoring with direct UI access.

The strategic context for this framework is detailed in our comprehensive overview of [generative engine optimization](/blog/what-is-generative-engine-optimization-geo).

Implementation results compound across industries when both layers are deployed together:

| Client Type | Duration | Starting AI Visibility | Ending AI Visibility | Pipeline Impact |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Series A Fintech (Payroll OS) | 92 days | 2.4% | 12.9% | 20% of demo requests influenced by AI discovery |
| Enterprise B2B (Quantum Computing) | 123 days | 1.1% | 5.9% | AI-influenced enterprise leads +16% QoQ |
| Asia Commerce Agency (Export Consulting) | 86 days | 3.6% | 13.8% | 17% of inbound leads influenced by AI discovery |
| DTC E-commerce (Art Deco) | 63 days | 5.8% | 19.2% | AI-driven referral traffic +58% |

Industry data from published GEO case studies demonstrates that structured programs produce consistent visibility improvements across sectors. Ramp, a fintech SaaS provider, grew its AI visibility from 3.2% to 22.2% through a structured program. Rootly, an incident management SaaS, achieved a 10x citation rate improvement and a 2.5x increase in non-branded mentions.

## AI Overview Visibility and Technical Optimization FAQ

### Why are my pages ranking on Google page one but not appearing in AI Overviews?
**Ranking well in organic search and earning AI Overview citations are driven by distinct signals, as only 17% of AI Overview citations come from the organic top 10.** BrightEdge data from 2025 and 2026 shows that RAG retrieval systems prioritize semantic structure, entity clarity, and factual density over traditional backlink authority. A page at position 47 with clean schema and direct answers can outcompete a position 2 page optimized for keyword density.

### Which types of commercial queries trigger Google AI Overviews most frequently?
**B2B technology, healthcare, and education queries trigger AI Overviews at rates exceeding 80%, while consumer shopping queries trigger at only 3.2%.** According to BrightEdge 2025-2026 data, B2B tech triggers at 82%, healthcare at 88%, and education at 83%. Long-tail queries of four or more words trigger AI Overviews between 46% and 60.85% of the time, meaning evaluation-stage B2B queries are almost always intercepted.

### What is `llms.txt` and does it actually affect AI Overview citations?
**The `llms.txt` file is a root directory guide that improves AI Overview citations by providing crawlers with clean, readable content formats.** Deployment of `llms.txt` reduces LLM token processing costs by nearly 30% and improves model accuracy by over 7%, according to Yotpo analysis. With only 10% of domains currently using it per SE Ranking data, it represents a high-leverage technical step with a meaningful first-mover advantage.

### How long does it take to start appearing in AI Overviews after optimizing?

Initial visibility lifts typically occur within 2 to 8 weeks for targeted prompts, while meaningful pipeline impact generally appears within 60 to 90 days. Pipeline impact includes demo requests and qualified leads specifically attributed to AI discovery. The implementation timeline compresses when the content layer (prompt-matched articles) and infrastructure layer (schema, `llms.txt`, and crawler accessibility) are deployed together rather than sequentially.

| Performance Metric | Expected Timeline |
| :--- | :--- |
| Initial Visibility Lift | 2 to 8 weeks |
| Meaningful Pipeline Impact (Demos/Leads) | 60 to 90 days |

## Does improving AI Overview visibility hurt existing Google rankings?

**No, the content and infrastructure changes required for AI Overview citation do not conflict with traditional SEO and function as additive improvements.** BrightEdge data shows a 60% overlap between Perplexity citations and Google top 10 results, confirming that strong organic rankings provide a baseline authority that facilitates AI citation. Adding structured schema, improving semantic clarity, and deploying `llms.txt` makes existing pages more useful to both human visitors and AI crawlers simultaneously.

# Sources

1. BrightEdge: AI Overviews One Year Presence and Size Study
2. Writtenly Hub: AI Overviews BrightEdge Data 2026 SEO
3. Yotpo: What is llms.txt?
4. Forrester: Stand Out in AI Search Guide
5. Digital Commerce 360: Forrester AI Search Reshaping B2B Marketing
6. arXiv: Generative Engine Optimization (Aggarwal et al., 2023)
7. Semrush: AI Overviews Study
8. Averi.ai: Google AI Overviews Optimization How to Get Featured in 2026
9. Search Engine Land: llms.txt Is a Treasure Map for AI
10. SE Ranking: llms.txt Analysis

# Get a Free AI Content Assessment

Mersel AI offers a free AI content assessment for organizations observing flattened commercial keyword traffic due to AI Overview interception. This assessment measures the specific prompts buyers use and determines where your brand appears in AI responses. The process maps your prompt coverage against competitors and identifies the highest-impact gaps to close first.

# Related Reading

- The Impact of AI Overviews on B2B Organic Traffic
- How AI Search Algorithms Read and Rank Content
- How to Optimize Content for AI Search Engines

# Related Posts

[GEO · Apr 27

## Best Manufacturing SEO Agencies in 2026: 7 That Actually Know Industrial

This evidence-based review identifies the seven best manufacturing SEO agencies for 2026, scoring each firm based on verified case studies, transparent pricing, and industrial specialization. [GEO · Mar 18](/blog/best-manufacturing-seo-agencies)

## AI Is Showing Wrong Info About Your Product: How to Fix It

**AI hallucinations cost businesses $67.4B in 2024, resulting in wrong pricing, fake features, and fabricated limits that [silently kill sales pipelines](/blog/what-happens-when-ai-gets-product-information-wrong).** This financial impact stems from AI-generated misinformation that provides incorrect data to potential buyers during the research process.

The primary types of AI-generated misinformation include:
*   Wrong pricing
*   Fake features
*   Fabricated limits

[GEO · Mar 18]

## AEO vs. SEO vs. GEO: Which Strategy Should Your Team Prioritize in 2026?

**Deciding which discipline deserves your 2026 investment requires understanding that SEO, AEO, and GEO are not interchangeable and involve specific market data and budget logic.** You can [learn the exact differences, market data, and budget logic](/blog/what-is-an-answer-engine) to determine the best path for your team's prioritization.

| Strategy Discipline | Exact Differences | Market Data | Budget Logic |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **SEO** | Not interchangeable | Required for 2026 investment | Required for 2026 investment |
| **AEO** | Not interchangeable | Required for 2026 investment | Required for 2026 investment |
| **GEO** | Not interchangeable | Required for 2026 investment | Required for 2026 investment |

### On This Page
The following topics are covered in this guide to help you navigate generative search:
*   Key Takeaways
*   Why AI Overviews Are Eating Commercial Traffic
*   The Formatting Guide for Google's Generative Search Parameters
*   Step-by-Step Implementation Guide
*   When DIY Implementation Fails
*   The Managed Path: How a Full-Stack GEO Program Handles This
*   FAQ
*   Sources
*   Get a Free AI Content Assessment
*   Related Reading

### Mersel AI Lead Generation
Mersel AI helps B2B businesses get inbound leads from AI search and Google. The company is supported by major technology startup programs, including ![NVIDIA Inception [Cloudflare for Startups](/logos/cloudflare-startups-white.webp)](https://www.cloudflare.com/forstartups/) and [![Google Cloud for Startups](/logos/CloudforStartups-3.webp)](https://cloud.google.com/startup).

### Learn
*   [What is GEO?](/generative-engine-optimization)

### Company
*   [About](/about)
*   [Blog](/blog)
*   [Pricing](/pricing)
*   [FAQs](/faqs)
*   [Contact Us](/contact)
*   [Login](/login)

### Legal
*   [Privacy Policy](/privacy)
*   [Terms of Service](/terms)

### Contact
San Francisco, California

### Site Navigation
[What is GEO?](/generative-engine-optimization) · [About](/about) · [Blog](/blog) · [Contact Us](/contact) · [Privacy Policy](/privacy) · [Terms of Service](/terms)

### Cookie Policy
This site uses cookies to improve your experience and analyze site usage. You can read our [Privacy Policy](/privacy) for more information.
*   Accept
*   Decline

```json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
  "itemListElement": [
    {
      "@type": "ListItem",
      "position": 1,
      "name": "Home",
      "item": "https://mersel.ai/"
    },
    {
      "@type": "ListItem",
      "position": 2,
      "name": "Blog",
      "item": "https://mersel.ai/blog/blog"
    },
    {
      "@type": "ListItem",
      "position": 3,
      "name": "How To Appear In Google Ai Overviews",
      "item": "https://mersel.ai/blog/how-to-appear-in-google-ai-overviews/how-to-appear-in-google-ai-overviews"
    }
  ]
}
```

```json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Article",
  "headline": "How to Appear in Google AI Overviews: Optimization Guide | Mersel AI",
  "url": "https://mersel.ai/blog/how-to-appear-in-google-ai-overviews",
  "publisher": {
    "@type": "Organization",
    "name": "Mersel AI"
  }
}
```