---
title: How AI Decides Which Software to Recommend (Signals, Proof, and ROI) | Mersel AI
site: Mersel AI
site_url: https://mersel.ai
description: An analysis of the signals AI engines use to recommend software, including an ROI model for AI visibility and a framework for publishing citable proof assets.
page_type: blog
url: https://mersel.ai/blog/how-ai-decides-which-software-to-recommend
canonical_url: https://mersel.ai/blog/how-ai-decides-which-software-to-recommend
language: en
author: Mersel AI
breadcrumb: Home > Blog > How AI Decides Which Software to Recommend
date_modified: 2025-05-22
---

> AI answer engines are fundamentally reshaping the B2B funnel, with Gartner projecting a 25% drop in traditional search volume by 2026. To secure recommendations, software brands must prioritize bot-readable HTML and structured proof pages, as comparison articles currently drive 32.5% of all AI citations. Implementing directional signal improvements can yield measurable results in AI answers within 2-6 weeks. By focusing on retrieval availability and proof quality, companies can mitigate the 15% traffic decline already observed in major information hubs like Wikipedia.

# The Signals That Drive Recommendations

Retrieval availability, proof quality, and freshness are the decisive variables for AI software recommendations, rather than keyword density or traditional SEO domain authority. Most AI answer engines utilize a retrieval-augmented pattern, where they retrieve live documents for a buyer's query and synthesize an answer from the findings.

**The core idea in one sentence: AI recommends software when it can retrieve, verify, and quote trustworthy sources — so winning means publishing machine-readable proof pages, earning third-party validation, and keeping your source of truth accurate and fresh.**

AI answer engines recommend software when they can (a) retrieve reliable sources for the buyer's question and (b) trust the evidence enough to name a shortlist. In practice, recommendations favor brands that show up consistently in authoritative third-party sources, publish clear machine-readable "source of truth" pages, and keep key facts fresh — especially for comparisons and pricing.

This page turns that reality into a practical signal table, an ROI framing, and a measurement plan CMOs can use to decide whether to invest in signal-building, monitoring, or managed execution. For the broader [generative engine optimization](/blog/generative-engine-optimization-guide) framework, start there.

### Article Information
- **Title:** How AI Decides Which Software to Recommend (Signals, Proof, and ROI)
- **Author:** Mersel AI Team
- **Date:** March 10, 2026
- **Reading Time:** 12 min read
- **Navigation:** [Home](/) | [

## Signal Table

| Signal | Why It Matters | Implementation Strategy | Priority |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Retrievability** | **AI systems retrieve live documents to synthesize answers for comparison and "best" prompts.** Systems exclude pages that are not indexed, linked, and crawlable before the synthesis phase occurs. | • Ensure comparison-intent pages ("X vs Y," "alternatives") are indexable, linkable, and crawlable.<br>• Publish pages that specifically match evaluation prompts. | **Critical** |
| **Bot-readable HTML** | **Systems cannot quote facts if bots fail to render JS-heavy pages.** Client-side-only rendering for pricing and features is a primary failure point for AI discovery. | • Use SSR/SSG for key pages.<br>• Avoid relying on client-only rendering for pricing and features.<br>• Optionally use an AI-readable delivery layer. | **Critical** |
| **Entity Clarity & Fact Consistency** | **AI recommendations favor brands with unambiguous categories, use cases, and claims.** Inconsistent naming of plans and features across pages causes synthesis errors and confusion. | • Add a "What it is / Best for / Not for" box.<br>• Define category terms clearly.<br>• Standardize plan and feature names across the site. | **Critical** |
| **Third-party Authority & Consensus** | **Recommendations require justification through mentions across multiple trusted sources.** AI engines rarely name brands that exist exclusively on their own domain without external validation. | • Build review

# Turning Signal Improvements into ROI

AI visibility improvements generate business outcomes even when traditional click-through rates decline. Buyers increasingly consume answers directly within AI summaries, shifting the primary ROI question from "Did we get the click?" to "Did we become the recommended option in the buyer's decision flow?" This transition reflects a fundamental change in how users interact with search and recommendation engines.

| Research Source | Metric | Impact/Projection |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| [University of Washington study](https://arxiv.org/html/2602.18455) | Wikipedia Daily Traffic | Approximately 15% reduction due to AI Overviews |
| [Gartner projects](https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-02-19-gartner-predicts-search-engine-volume-will-drop-25-percent-by-2026-due-to-ai-chatbots-and-other-virtual-agents) | Traditional Search Volume | 25% drop by 2026 |

## ROI Translation Model

The ROI Translation Model categorizes performance metrics into three distinct stages to track the effectiveness of AI optimization strategies.

| Indicator Category | ROI Focus | Key Metrics |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Leading Indicators** | Signal ROI | Prompt coverage (priority prompts returning brand); Citation and mention rate; AI Share of Voice across comparison prompts; Accuracy of pricing and features in AI answers; Third-party proof coverage |
| **Mid Indicators** | Traffic ROI | AI referrals to site; Branded search lift; Engagement on comparison and ROI pages; Demo or lead form starts from AI-referred sessions |
| **Lagging Indicators** | Pipeline ROI | Demo requests influenced by AI referrals; Sales-qualified leads in accounts where AI research was part of the buyer journey; Win-rate shifts in deals where buyers mention AI research |

**Explicit Attribution Caveats:**

*   **Platform-specific citation styles:** Different AI platforms cite differently; some provide direct citations while others summarize without links, requiring platform-specific sampling for Share of Voice.
*   **Pipeline routing:** A brand can gain citations without generating pipeline if the cited pages do not effectively route users to evaluation CTAs.
*   **Fixed prompt sets:** "Signal lift" (mentions and citations) must be evaluated on a fixed prompt set to ensure objective measurement and avoid cherry-picking.

# Proof Assets to Publish So You Become Citable

**Proof pages function as product infrastructure rather than marketing content to ensure they serve as reliable citation sources for AI engines.** Organizations must publish structured assets that include specific sections and proof blocks to be usable by generative models. This framework ensures that the data retrieved by AI is accurate, authoritative, and directly supports the brand's core value propositions.

| Proof asset | Required sections | Required proof blocks |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Category + positioning page** | Definition, who it's for, "best for / not for," key differentiators | 3–5 claims each linked to evidence; sources strip |
| **Comparison hub** | "X vs Y" pages, alternatives page, "best tools for…" | Fair comparison criteria + cited sources; "last updated" + change notes |
| **Pricing source of truth** | Pricing model, what's included, exclusions, procurement FAQs | Policy on ranges if pricing isn't public; update on every pricing change |
| **Integrations page** | Supported integrations, setup steps, limitations | Partner links + docs; consistent integration names across site |
| **Security / trust page** | Security posture, compliance claims, policies | Public docs + scope limitations; avoid unsupported compliance claims |
| **Benchmark / results page** | Benchmark table, test methodology, caveats | Dataset or source list; confidence notes; downloadable appendix |

**Implementation note:** Schema markup must match the content that is actually visible to users on the page. Adding structured data for content that is not visible is explicitly flagged as a violation in guidelines and undermines brand credibility. Schema that contradicts visible content directly weakens the trust signals required for AI engines to recommend a brand.

## How to Test Signal Changes

Fixed prompt probes serve as the core method for testing signal changes. Choose a set of 25–50 buyer prompts covering highest-intent categories like "best [category] tool," "[your tool] vs [competitor]," "[competitor] alternatives," "[your tool] pricing," and "[your tool] security." Sample these results on a fixed cadence to track which sources are cited and whether your brand appears.

Cross-platform sampling ensures visibility across different AI engines because retrieval methods vary; a citation on one platform does not guarantee citations across all. For before/after content tests, document the "before" state including prompt output and sources cited. Ship the update to a proof page and re-run the same prompts after 2–4 weeks to obtain a directional signal without controlled A/B infrastructure.

**Metrics to track:**

*   **Agent visits:** AI user agents crawling your pages, identified from server logs.
*   **Citations and mentions:** Frequency per prompt, per platform, and per time window.
*   **AI referrals:** Sessions from AI referrers tracked in web analytics.
*   **Downstream conversions:** Demo requests, trial starts, and contact submissions.

**Sampling cadence:**

*   **Weekly:** Frequency for the first month to catch fast shifts.
*   **Bi-weekly:** Standard sampling frequency after the initial month.
*   **Monthly:** Executive rollup for reporting and strategic review.

## Monthly Refresh Plan

| Trigger | What it signals | Action |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Pricing or features changed | High risk of AI repeating stale info | Update pricing truth blocks immediately; add "last updated"; refresh FAQ |
| Citation rate stalls | Low quoteability or weak proof | Move summary and table above fold; add proof strip; strengthen third-party references |
| AI referrals rise, conversions flat | Poor routing to evaluation | Add internal links to pricing and demo pages; tighten CTAs on cited pages |
| Competitor dominates "vs/alternatives" prompts | Missing coverage or weaker proof | Publish or refresh comparisons; add fair criteria and sourced tables |
| JS render issues discovered | AI agents can't parse key content | Implement SSR/SSG for key pages; avoid long-term dynamic rendering workarounds |

# How to Decide Between Monitoring, Signal-Building, and Managed Execution

**The decision between monitoring, signal-building, and managed execution depends entirely on identifying where your actual bottleneck sits.** Determining whether your primary obstacle is visibility measurement or a lack of execution capacity ensures that resources are allocated to the most impactful GEO interventions first.

*   **Visibility Measurement Bottleneck ("We can't see where we show up"):**
    *   Purchase monitoring first to track specific prompts and citations.
    *   If the backlog grows faster than output after 30 days, add managed execution.
    *   If the backlog remains manageable, invest in signal-building.
*   **Proof and Execution Bottleneck ("We know we aren't recommended"):**
    *   If the team has the bandwidth to ship proof pages monthly, invest in signal-building (including proof collection, answer-object pages, and refresh loops).
    *   If there is no reliable internal cadence for shipping, buy managed execution to provide the execution layer that ships fixes.
*   **Universal Success Metrics:** Both paths require measuring citations, mentions, AI referrals, and demo requests with a monthly refresh cycle.

**Monitoring is the appropriate first purchase for brands that lack a clear understanding of which prompts they appear in and which competitors are being recommended.** This investment establishes a baseline prompt set and citation rate, providing the data necessary to measure the success of future signal improvements across AI platforms.

**Signal-building is the primary investment for brands that are not currently recommended but have the internal capacity to publish and refresh two to six pages per month.** This strategy focuses on creating proof pages, comparison content, and third-party mentions to improve visibility and authority within retrieval-augmented patterns and AI answer engines.

**Managed execution is the necessary choice when internal bandwidth is the primary constraint preventing the consistent shipping of proof pages and pricing updates.** Adding more monitoring tools when execution is the bottleneck only increases the backlog without improving outcomes; managed execution ensures the monthly iteration loop is completed to drive better results.

## Why does AI recommend some brands and not others in the same category?

**AI engines recommend specific brands based on their ability to retrieve, confidently quote, and triangulate data across multiple trustworthy sources.** Brands with clear comparison pages, consistent third-party mentions, and accurate proof are named more consistently than brands that exist primarily in their own marketing copy. 

AI platforms prioritize brands that provide:
*   Information that AI can retrieve and quote confidently.
*   Data that is triangulated across multiple trustworthy sources.
*   Clear comparison pages and consistent third-party mentions.
*   Accurate proof rather than information found only in marketing copy.

## Does schema markup directly improve AI recommendations?

**Schema markup functions as a supporting signal that improves content interpretability rather than acting as a direct trigger for AI recommendations.** Schema assists AI systems in understanding entities, page meaning, and content relationships. While schema enhances the clarity of your data, its overall impact varies significantly depending on the specific AI platform and the nature of the user prompt.

*   **Matching Content:** Schema that matches visible content improves interpretability.
*   **Non-Matching Content:** Schema that does not match visible content undermines trust.
*   **Platform Variance:** The impact of these signals varies by platform and prompt type.

## How long before signal improvements show up in AI answers?

**Signal improvements typically manifest in AI answers within 2 to 6 weeks of publishing well-structured proof pages, though timing varies by platform, prompt type, and retrieval index update frequency.** Directional signals, specifically citation rate changes on a fixed prompt set, appear within this initial window. Pipeline impact lags further behind these primary visibility changes.

## What if we can't publish pricing publicly?

**If public pricing cannot be disclosed, brands should publish qualitative details and procedural instructions to provide AI engines with accurate, citable context.** The primary goal is to give AI something accurate to quote rather than leaving a data vacuum. Silence on pricing often leads AI to repeat competitor pricing or fabricate numbers.

To provide AI with accurate data, publish the following information:
*   Details on what is included.
*   Specific factors that drive the scope.
*   A clear statement that "pricing ranges are available on request."
*   An explanation of what the procurement process looks like.

A direct statement such as "Pricing varies by scope — contact us" is significantly better than silence. This specific approach ensures that AI engines do not repeat competitor pricing or fabricate numbers when users inquire about your brand's pricing and procurement.

## Does this apply to all AI platforms equally?

**AI platforms do not apply recommendation logic equally because they utilize different retrieval methods, citation styles, and index update cadences.** Brands must build a prompt set covering the specific platforms their buyers use and sample performance cross-platform. Optimizing for a single engine is insufficient; instead, focus on broad signal improvements that satisfy the varying technical requirements of the different engines your buyers utilize.

**Related reading:**

*   GEO for AI Tools: How to Win Comparison Prompts
*   How to Make Your Website AI-Readable Without Rebuilding
*   How to Get Cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude
*   GEO: Beyond Analytics to Execution
*   Why Monitoring Tools Aren't Enough for GEO

If you're ready to move from monitoring to measurable signal improvements, [book a call](/contact) — we'll map your highest-priority prompts, audit your current proof coverage, and show you what a managed GEO program would own versus what your team retains.

# Sources

1. Gartner. "Search Engine Volume Will Drop 25 Percent by 2026." gartner.com
2. Khosravi & Yoganarasimhan. "Impact of AI Search Summaries on Website Traffic." arxiv.org

# Related Posts

[GEO · Mar 16

## Why AI Gets Your Pricing Wrong (and the 10-Step Playbook to Fix It)

**ChatGPT and Perplexity frequently show incorrect pricing and features because of nine distinct root causes that misalign AI training data with current brand offerings.** This guide provides a strategic framework to fix these inaccuracies fast and ensure data integrity across generative engines.

| Resource Component | Details |
| :--- | :--- |
| Root Causes | Analysis of the 9 reasons AI gets pricing and features wrong |
| Correction Workflow | A 10-step playbook to fix inaccuracies fast |
| Publication Date | GEO · Mar 16 |

Access the full [10-step playbook to fix AI pricing and feature inaccuracies](/blog/how-to-fix-ai-pricing-feature-inaccuracies) to optimize your brand's visibility and correct platform errors.

## How to Get Cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude (B2B SaaS Playbook)

**[The B2B SaaS Playbook provides a five-step system for earning AI citations from ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude.](/blog/how-to-get-cited-by-chatgpt-perplexity-gemini-claude)** This system for earning AI citations from ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude ensures brands are cited through prompt mapping, answer objects, proof signals, and refresh loops. [GEO · Mar 10]

The five-step system for earning citations includes:
- Prompt mapping
- Answer objects
- Proof signals
- Refresh loops

## GEO for AI Tools: How to Win Comparison Prompts

Comparison articles earn 32.5% of AI citations, making them a critical target for B2B SaaS visibility. This GEO playbook provides a strategic framework for building "vs" pages that AI engines can easily quote, utilizing a specific template, prompt map, and refresh loop to maintain data accuracy. [Access the full playbook here.](/blog/geo-for-ai-tools-win-comparison-prompts)

### On this page
- The Signals That Drive Recommendations
- Turning Signal Improvements into ROI
- Proof Assets to Publish So You Become Citable
- Testing, Measurement, and Refresh Loop
- How to Decide What to Buy First
- FAQ
- Sources

### Business Solutions and Partnerships
Mersel AI helps B2B businesses generate inbound leads from AI search and Google. The brand is recognized within major technology startup ecosystems:

| Organization | Reference Link |
| :--- | :--- |
| NVIDIA Inception | [Cloudflare for Startups](https://www.cloudflare.com/forstartups/) |
| Cloudflare for Startups | [/logos/cloudflare-startups-white.webp](/logos/cloudflare-startups-white.webp) |
| Google Cloud for Startups | [https://cloud.google.com/startup](https://cloud.google.com/startup) |

### Learn
- [What is GEO?](/generative-engine-optimization)

### Company Resources
- [About](/about)
- [Blog](/blog)
- [Pricing](/pricing)
- [FAQs](/faqs)
- [Contact Us](/contact)
- [Login](/login)

### Legal and Contact Information
- **Legal:** [Privacy Policy](/privacy), [Terms of Service](/terms)
- **Contact:** San Francisco, California
- **Quick Links:** [What is GEO?](/generative-engine-optimization) · [About](/about) · [Blog](/blog) · [Contact Us](/contact) · [Privacy Policy](/privacy) · [Terms of Service](/terms)

### Cookie Policy
This site uses cookies to improve your experience and analyze site usage. You can read our [Privacy Policy](/privacy) for more details. Options: Accept or Decline.

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Why does AI recommend some brands and not others in the same category?
**AI recommends brands that it can retrieve, verify, and triangulate across multiple authoritative third-party sources.** Systems favor brands with clear machine-readable "source of truth" pages and consistent naming of features. Brands that appear in comparison articles and industry directories are more likely to be named in a shortlist than those that only exist on their own website.

### How long before signal improvements show up in AI answers?
**Directional signal improvements typically appear in AI answers within 2 to 6 weeks of publishing structured proof pages.** This timeline varies based on how frequently specific AI platforms update their retrieval indices and the type of prompt being used. Pipeline impact and lead generation shifts usually lag further behind these initial visibility changes.

### What if a company cannot publish its pricing publicly?
**Companies should publish pricing ranges, procurement FAQs, or clear statements about what drives scope to provide AI with accurate data to quote.** Providing a "pricing available on request" policy is superior to silence, which often leads AI models to fabricate numbers or repeat outdated information from third-party sources. The goal is to establish a verifiable source of truth that AI agents can parse.

### What is Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) and how does it work?
**Generative Engine Optimization is a framework focused on improving retrieval availability, proof quality, and content freshness to earn AI citations.** It works by publishing bot-readable HTML (SSR/SSG), creating purpose-built comparison hubs, and maintaining structured data that matches visible page content. This ensures AI agents can accurately synthesize a brand's value proposition during the retrieval-augmented generation process.

### How does AI Search Optimization differ from traditional SEO?
**AI Search Optimization prioritizes retrieval availability and synthesis quality over traditional metrics like keyword density or domain authority.** While SEO focuses on ranking for clicks, AI optimization focuses on becoming the recommended option within an AI-generated summary. This requires a shift toward building "answer-object" pages and securing mentions in the specific documents AI engines retrieve for evaluation-intent prompts.

### Why is structured data optimization important for AI-driven search results?
**Structured data helps AI systems interpret entities, page meaning, and content relationships with higher confidence.** When schema markup matches visible content, it improves the reliability of how a page is cited. However, inconsistent or hidden schema can undermine a brand's credibility and lead to synthesis confusion in AI models.

### How does Mersel AI compare to Semrush?
**Mersel AI provides a fully managed execution layer and AI-specific visibility analytics, whereas Semrush focuses on traditional SEO visibility and keyword tools.** Mersel AI specifically addresses the "execution bottleneck" by shipping agent-optimized pages and proof assets, offering a performance guarantee of 2x investment returns within six months.

## Related Pages
- [90 天打造 Generative Engine Optimization 策略](/zh-TW/blog/how-to-build-generative-engine-optimization-strategy-90-days)
- [如何讓你的品牌出現在 Google AI Overviews](/zh-TW/blog/how-to-appear-in-google-ai-overviews)
- [Mersel AI vs. Semrush AI 能量度工具](/zh-TW/blog/mersel-ai-vs-semrush-aio-feature-breakdown)
- [為什麼 ChatGPT 等 AI 模型特別愛引用表格和列表？](/zh-TW/blog/how-ai-interprets-tables-and-lists-in-web-content)

## About Mersel AI
Mersel AI provides fully managed Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) to help B2B companies generate qualified buyer inquiries from AI platforms and Google. Trusted by over 100 companies, Mersel AI specializes in capturing leads from engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity with a proven performance guarantee.

```json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
  "itemListElement": [
    {
      "@type": "ListItem",
      "position": 1,
      "name": "Home",
      "item": "https://mersel.ai/"
    },
    {
      "@type": "ListItem",
      "position": 2,
      "name": "Blog",
      "item": "https://mersel.ai/blog/blog"
    },
    {
      "@type": "ListItem",
      "position": 3,
      "name": "How Ai Decides Which Software To Recommend",
      "item": "https://mersel.ai/blog/how-ai-decides-which-software-to-recommend/how-ai-decides-which-software-to-recommend"
    }
  ]
}
```

```json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "Why does AI recommend some brands and not others in the same category?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "**AI recommends brands that it can retrieve, verify, and triangulate across multiple authoritative third-party sources.** Systems favor brands with clear machine-readable \"source of truth\" pages and consistent naming of features. Brands that appear in comparison articles and industry directories are more likely to be named in a shortlist than those that only exist on their own website."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How long before signal improvements show up in AI answers?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "**Directional signal improvements typically appear in AI answers within 2 to 6 weeks of publishing structured proof pages.** This timeline varies based on how frequently specific AI platforms update their retrieval indices and the type of prompt being used. Pipeline impact and lead generation shifts usually lag further behind these initial visibility changes."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What if a company cannot publish its pricing publicly?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "**Companies should publish pricing ranges, procurement FAQs, or clear statements about what drives scope to provide AI with accurate data to quote.** Providing a \"pricing available on request\" policy is superior to silence, which often leads AI models to fabricate numbers or repeat outdated information from third-party sources. The goal is to establish a verifiable source of truth that AI agents can parse."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) and how does it work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "**Generative Engine Optimization is a framework focused on improving retrieval availability, proof quality, and content freshness to earn AI citations.** It works by publishing bot-readable HTML (SSR/SSG), creating purpose-built comparison hubs, and maintaining structured data that matches visible page content. This ensures AI agents can accurately synthesize a brand's value proposition during the retrieval-augmented generation process."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does AI Search Optimization differ from traditional SEO?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "**AI Search Optimization prioritizes retrieval availability and synthesis quality over traditional metrics like keyword density or domain authority.** While SEO focuses on ranking for clicks, AI optimization focuses on becoming the recommended option within an AI-generated summary. This requires a shift toward building \"answer-object\" pages and securing mentions in the specific documents AI engines retrieve for evaluation-intent prompts."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "Why is structured data optimization important for AI-driven search results?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "**Structured data helps AI systems interpret entities, page meaning, and content relationships with higher confidence.** When schema markup matches visible content, it improves the reliability of how a page is cited. However, inconsistent or hidden schema can undermine a brand's credibility and lead to synthesis confusion in AI models."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Mersel AI compare to Semrush?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "**Mersel AI provides a fully managed execution layer and AI-specific visibility analytics, whereas Semrush focuses on traditional SEO visibility and keyword tools.** Mersel AI specifically addresses the \"execution bottleneck\" by shipping agent-optimized pages and proof assets, offering a performance guarantee of 2x investment returns within six months."
      }
    }
  ]
}
```

```json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Article",
  "headline": "How AI Decides Which Software to Recommend (Signals, Proof, and ROI) | Mersel AI",
  "url": "https://mersel.ai/blog/how-ai-decides-which-software-to-recommend",
  "publisher": {
    "@type": "Organization",
    "name": "Mersel AI"
  }
}
```